Pages

Thursday, October 13, 2011

The Power of Proper Grammar: A Critique of Andy Lamey’s Going Nuclear over Nucular

If you order your essay from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on The Power of Proper Grammar: A Critique of Andy Lamey’s Going Nuclear over Nucular. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality The Power of Proper Grammar: A Critique of Andy Lamey’s Going Nuclear over Nucular paper right on time.

Out staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in The Power of Proper Grammar: A Critique of Andy Lamey’s Going Nuclear over Nucular, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your The Power of Proper Grammar: A Critique of Andy Lamey’s Going Nuclear over Nucular paper at affordable prices with http://livepaperhelp.com!



Many English language buffs in today’s modern society bemoan the constant misuse of the English language. It seems, to many, that no one knows ( or cares to use) proper English anymore. Andy Lamey’s article Going Nuclear over Nucular is an examination of the situation from an unusual standpoint. Andy Lamey, a journalist with the National Post, holds the view that grammatical correctness is just another form of snobbery. He attacks grammar buffs, or “language bullies” as he likes to call them. He commences his tirade by admitting that he too was once a “language bully”. He defines the term by citing that their prerogative is to attack “anything and everything that came out of people’s mouths.” to demonstrate their “vast learning”. According to Lamey, language bullying has become a trend thanks to Dubya’s steady misuse of the English language. Grammatical correctness is “old fashioned” and “conservative in the worst sense”. Lamey even goes so far as to deem the practice “wrong and cranky”. In an attempt to show that good grammar does not necessarily a good leader make, Lamey cites Churcill’s most famous quote which ends with a preposition. Lamey adds a final blow by citing that attention to grammar is just another form of racism, where” white speech good, black speech bad”. Lamey urges us to criticize Bush’s politics not his faulty grammar.


Poor grammar in North America may seem a trifling issue to people like Mr. Lamey, but for the majority of the world, in is not. The United States of America is the most powerful nation in the world, yet most of it’s inhabitants cannot read or write above a grade level. Upon taking this into consideration it is decidedly fitting that a president so aptly mirrors his people. Dubya massacres the English language, without shame. Why should he feel shame? Many Americans don’t know, or care the difference between Nucular or nuclear. There is even an ever growing stigma against those who do use proper English, as is evident in this article. Lamey’s blatant distaste for the language snobs or “bullies” as he refers to them, seem to stem more from self-centered issues that concrete facts. He believes that grammar books should reflect “common usage”. Our language shouldn’t adhere to “old fashioned” or dubious standards. By advocating this Lamey is advocating the principle of adhering to the values of the lowest common denominator. Should our society allow the uneducated to govern the language? Lamey tries to defend his thesis by citing Churchill’s grammatical stumble. What Lamey fails to mention is that Churchill was a famed and powerful orator, well schooled in the use of the English language. In such cases a minor grammatical stumble is permissible. What is not permissible is the constant butchering of the language that goes on daily. Spell and Grammar check may work with written documents, but when it comes to speech one must rely on one’s own knowledge of proper grammar. This issue of grammatical correctness as a form of “bullying” is soley a North American problem. Slang is spoken in every corner of the world, in different tongues, but that doesn’t mean you will hear Tony Blair proclaim that he “ain’t gonna”. Slang is to be tolerated as what it is relaxed and colloquial, but it is by no means the ship by which we steer our language. North America is one of the only areas in which people generally only speak one ( or maybe two) languages. In Europe it is common to find people who speak four or five languages. One would think that with so few languages to learn, North Americans could, and should manage one correctly.







Order College Papers on The Power of Proper Grammar: A Critique of Andy Lamey’s Going Nuclear over Nucular

essay writing service

Please note that this sample paper on The Power of Proper Grammar: A Critique of Andy Lamey’s Going Nuclear over Nucular is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on The Power of Proper Grammar: A Critique of Andy Lamey’s Going Nuclear over Nucular, we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on The Power of Proper Grammar: A Critique of Andy Lamey’s Going Nuclear over Nucular will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment from http://livepaperhelp.com and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!



0 comments:

Post a Comment