Pages

Sunday, October 9, 2011

Why Plagiarism is Bad

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Why Plagiarism is Bad. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Why Plagiarism is Bad paper right on time.

Out staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Why Plagiarism is Bad, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Why Plagiarism is Bad paper at affordable prices with livepaperhelp.com!



Plagiarism should never be tolerated.


If I was a Television Aesthete…


As much as I like the cultural studies/ethnographic research on how viewers read/use television and how these studies illustrate ways in which audiences have more power within such a commercial industry (Fiske), I am wary of throwing away any hope of establishing a television aesthetics . While the wrangling over whether or not television is (a) high art(form) will probably go on forever�as it does even within traditionally sanctioned high art forms (e.g., “Are Mapplethorpe photographs art or pornography?”-type debates)�I don’t think the continual nature of this debate is enough of a reason to put off creating an aesthetics for television. It seems like many scholars want to wait to start “seriously” critiquing television until the medium is given high art status. However, only in creating�or more accurately, debating about�an aesthetics will we get any closer to deciding what kind of “art” television really is .


But, if, as Charlotte Brunsdon argues, scholars already implicitly create an aesthetics within their studies of audiences or narrative structure (e.g., self referentiality is “good”), why is it so difficult for scholars to really put themselves out there and state what good television is? Is it because the definition of television itself is debatable does “television” mean the individual texts on T.V. or the system of T.V. as a whole? If “television” refers to the entire televisual system, then creating an aesthetics might seem futile�how can you characterize beauty in something that essentially doesn’t end (and thus you don’t see entirely)? Or, if “television” refers to individual texts, wouldn’t establishing an aesthetics end up being so case-specific (e.g., “good” sitcoms should satirize society; “good” dramas should revolve around character relationships) that it wouldn’t be much use anyway? Also, would aesthetic critiques focus on the technical components of television, or on the actors’/writers’ abilities, or both?


Order custom research paper on Why Plagiarism is Bad

essay writing service






Please note that this sample paper on Why Plagiarism is Bad is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Why Plagiarism is Bad, we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on Why Plagiarism is Bad will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment from livepaperhelp.com and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!



0 comments:

Post a Comment